![]() Based on your findings, what studies do you plan to do next? What studies do you recommend other researchers in your field do in the future? In this paragraph, you want to describe the next steps following your study. If not, you can either summarize the limitations in a paragraph (as described above) or weave specific limitations into the relevant paragraphs of your discussion. This paragraph may be contained in its own short section of the Discussion. Did you have a small sample size? Were certain data unavailable? Are you aware of any biases in the analysis or interpretation? Be transparent and briefly discuss any possible caveats to the study. In the next paragraph, describe the limitations of your study and how they could have affected your data or analysis. If applicable, suggest additional experiments that are needed to clarify your results. Explain why you think these findings are interesting, why you think they occurred, and what you think they mean in a broader context.Īlso, mention any inconclusive results and explain them as best as you can. You will also want to discuss any unexpected or intriguing findings. Did you answer a similar question with a different model? Did you assess a different timeline or use a different reagent? If you find contradictions, explain why you think your results are different from what has already been shown. Discuss whether your results support or contradict findings shown in other studies. Describe how they extend the findings of previous studies. You also might consider grouping your evidence by topic and/or supporting data, or by following the same order that you described your results.Īs you work through your results, explain how they fit with existing literature. Interpret your important findingsįor the next several paragraphs, you want to interpret your results in a logical order. To organize these paragraphs, discuss your findings from most to least important. If your study used or established a new approach, you will want to use this paragraph to describe the new method or model and how it will help to advance your field. ![]() Then, state how your major findings help to move the field forward by addressing that knowledge gap. Then share your most important finding(s) and explain how they answer the question or fill the knowledge gap you described in the Introduction section. In this first paragraph, start with a statement that reminds your reader of the overarching hypothesis and approach of your study, which you already stated in your Introduction. To help you draft this challenging section, use the following outline to ensure that you include all the important information for your readers. In this way, you interpret your results in a broader context and highlight their significance to your field.įortunately, the Discussion section typically follows a standard structure. The main purpose of the Discussion is to describe what your results mean. But writing this section can be incredibly insightful. Many authors dread drafting this section. The Discussion section is the most important-and difficult-part of writing a manuscript.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |